Elara is a passionate writer and innovation coach, sharing her expertise to help others unlock their creative potential.
The number of reserved seats for Indigenous council members on NZ councils is set to be cut by more than half, after a controversial law change that forced municipal councils to put the future of hard-won Māori seats to a popular referendum.
Indigenous electoral districts, which may have one or more councillors based on demographic data, were created in 2001 to provide Indigenous voters the option to elect a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Initially, councils could only create a Indigenous seat by initially submitting it to a community referendum in their area. Communities frequently spent years building community backing and pushing their councils to create Māori wards.
To address this concern, the previous Labour government allowed local councils to establish a Māori ward without first requiring them to subject it to a public vote.
However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating communities ought to determine whether to introduce Indigenous representation.
The coalition’s law change required local authorities that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct binding referendums alongside the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the public vote, 17 decided to keep their wards, and twenty-five to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.
The results represented “a crucial move in reinstating community self-determination.”
Opposition parties however have condemned the government’s law change as “discriminatory” and “against Indigenous interests”. After assuming power, the current administration has ushered in extensive reversals to measures intended to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to terminate “ethnic-specific” policies, and asserts it is dedicated to improving outcomes for Indigenous people and every citizen.
The results of the public votes were split down city-country divisions – six of the seven cities required to vote backed Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.
“It’s a real shame for the Indigenous seats that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”
This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.
The process had been “a mockery”.
Councils are permitted to establish different wards – such as rural wards – without first requiring a public vote. The disparate requirements placed on Māori wards suggested the administration was targeting Māori representation.
“Well, they failed. Numerous localities have given the government a middle finger response.”
This remark concerned the 17 areas that voted to keep their wards.
Elara is a passionate writer and innovation coach, sharing her expertise to help others unlock their creative potential.
Carl Goodwin
Carl Goodwin
Carl Goodwin
Carl Goodwin